| Pages: [1] |
1. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Lee Kin Originally by: Ridjeck Thome Originally by: Sunset Rogue Since this topic is no longer a sticky, are we to assume that the issues discussed here have been resolved? Namely: Hel's missing bonus Fi...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2010.02.20 08:30:00
|
2. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sunset Rogue Since this topic is no longer a sticky, are we to assume that the issues discussed here have been resolved? Namely: Hel's missing bonus Fighterbomber's extreme vulnerability to bombs Leviathan -1 launcher...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2010.02.19 19:52:00
|
3. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
One issue that Ive not seen addressed is that of Slaves V Crystals and the magnified effect that Slaves currently have on the strength of supercap armour tanks. In the original (pre-dominion) thread, there was some acknowledgment that this issue...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.12.22 17:18:00
|
4. nvm - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ridjeck Thome on 13/11/2009 18:01:54 nvm
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.11.13 17:57:00
|
5. [Petition] Restore Motherships (supercarriers) to previous stats MKII - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.11.12 22:14:00
|
6. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ridjeck Thome on 12/11/2009 21:46:23 WTG CCP - fire and forget....... Give the bombshell and leave us paying customers wondering WTH is going on. Dont play the 'but we've gone home lark' on us - any sane company would be ab le to ...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.11.12 21:46:00
|
7. [Petition] Restore Motherships (supercarriers) to previous stats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.11.12 21:12:00
|
8. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Can I ask CCP to let us know when the changes are final please?. This will allow me (hopefully) to self-destruct my mothership and get the basic 40% insurance back (more than the new mini-mom cost I bet). I'll then be able to cancel my mom acc...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.11.12 16:55:00
|
9. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
wait, so not only do I get stuck with a 10bnisk+ loss - just becuase you cant be bothered to invent a mini-version of the mom...I now have to fly a coffin for one of my characters that even MORE worthless then it was before... if you really think...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.11.12 15:36:00
|
10. NT - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ridjeck Thome on 26/10/2009 19:03:01 nvm
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.10.26 18:57:00
|
11. Navy Battleship Paintjobs are Imbalanced - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ridjeck Thome on 28/09/2009 06:16:32 I cant see CCP changing the paintjobs. For one, they charged a lot of cash to people who bought the Faction BS models a few months ago painted in these colour schemes - if they then went and chan...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.09.28 06:15:00
|
12. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: aldarrin As I posted on the Titan feedback thread, I think the jump portal ability should migrate from the Titan hulls to the Supercarriers (Motherships). Carriers are capital class logistics boats that can dish out BS level...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.09.27 13:26:00
|
13. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ridjeck Thome on 20/09/2009 16:57:01 regarding the titan superweapon Vs supercarrier argument, I do wonder if the shield tanking Supercarriers will be at a disadvantage, in that they will take the entire initial hit against their pr...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2009.09.20 16:56:00
|
14. Cruiser Construction 5 for the new Heavy Interdictors :( - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
there are quite a few of us with Cruiser constuction 5 already - it doesnt take long to train
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2007.11.28 10:39:00
|
15. Devs: Why do Amarr have indefinete ammo? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Amarr use thier capacitor as ammo. If you want us to have to reload, then let us vary our damage types this issue has been rashed many many times on the forums already - do a search and youll find LOTS of threads on this to go through all the a...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2007.07.29 07:57:00
|
16. Heat Interface - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ridjeck Thome on 17/05/2007 16:52:19 i agree with this - as someone who has junked systems at work due to the number of mouse preses required to perform certain functions, please can you bear in mind stuff like ergonimics :). The s...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2007.05.17 16:54:00
|
17. ship invention - the mechanical engineering bottleneck (CCP help!) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/agree the requirements for decryptors (especially for ship jobs) is also creating massive amounts of spawn camping - do we really want WoW in space?. Get RID of the need for a decrpytor - the cost of datacores/ BPC/ ME inefficiency is already ...
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2007.03.28 15:59:00
|
18. Eve Windows Mobile Client Beta Testers? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Im on a WM5 phone too - if you need a relatively 'inexperienced' user's comments - Im willing to help out :P
- by Ridjeck Thome - at 2006.06.22 14:04:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |